Minting functions allow new tokens to be created potentially diluting existing holdings if used excessively. Without proper oversight this inflationary feature can erode market value disrupt price stability and reduce investor trust.
Lock Risk
High
Result: Active
Funds sent to this contract may be irreversibly locked preventing withdrawal. This permanent restriction poses a significant security threat leading to asset loss diminished market fluidity and weakened user trust.
Dynamic Fee Adjustment Risk
No Risk
Result: Inactive
Transfer fees remain fixed eliminating the risk of unexpected increases. This stable model promotes predictability for traders though it also removes flexibility to adapt fees for evolving market conditions.
Ownership Renounced
No Risk
Result: Active
The owner has retained control facilitating upgrades and improvements. However this heightened authority can raise centralization risks if changes are executed without community input or adequate security measures.
Fee Calculation Risk
No Risk
Result: Inactive
No transfer fee is imposed lowering barriers to frequent trading and supporting broader adoption. While it promotes higher liquidity it also removes a potential revenue source or tool for discouraging certain transaction behaviors.
Withdrawal Risk
No Risk
Result: Inactive
Funds in this contract are safeguarded against unauthorized withdrawals preserving user confidence and assets. Rigorous security measures or restricted withdrawal functionalities minimize the potential for exploits protecting investors from unforeseen losses.
Blacklisting Risk
No Risk
Result: Inactive
No blacklisting function exists ensuring all addresses can transact freely. By preventing address-based restrictions decentralization is upheld market liquidity remains unhindered and users retain confidence in fair open trading conditions.
Cooldown Risk
No Risk
Result: Inactive
No cooldown function is enforced allowing immediate consecutive transactions. While this fosters a faster trading environment it may increase exposure to market manipulation if not mitigated by other safeguards.
Verified Contract
No Risk
Result: Active
The contract’s source code is verified allowing users to confirm it matches the deployed version. This transparency fosters trust enabling community audits and reducing the likelihood of hidden exploits.
Whitelisting Risk
No Risk
Result: Inactive
No whitelisting mechanism is present ensuring all addresses follow the same rules. Removing special permissions reduces favoritism and maintains a consistent standard for transactions and user rights.
Max Limits Risk
No Risk
Result: Inactive
No cap on transfer size exists allowing unrestricted large transactions. While this fosters robust liquidity it may expose the market to abrupt price swings or manipulation through bulk transactions.
Owner Updates Risk
No Risk
Result: Inactive
The owner cannot change core parameters ensuring consistent rules and reducing unilateral decision-making. Although this limits adaptability it prevents abrupt modifications that could undermine trust or market stability.
Proxy Upgradeability Risk
No Risk
Result: Inactive
This contract is not upgradeable via a proxy removing the owner’s ability to alter fundamental functionalities. Users therefore face fewer risks from unexpected contract changes enjoying a more transparent and stable token environment.
Pausable Risk
No Risk
Result: Inactive
No pause function exists allowing uninterrupted token transfers and operations. Although it lacks an emergency stop mechanism it reduces centralization risks by preventing any single entity from unilaterally freezing contract activity.
